![]() ![]() In the first situation because you don't hold your ground and are “fishing” for the right answer. What is not acceptable is to just accept the information as the new answer, or to completely dismiss is because you “want to be right” at all costs. Then it's up to you to either accept it as valid information and update your anwer, or to reject it because you had a more valid way of thinking. ![]() What they will do (and I do this in most interviews) is to give you information that suggests you may be wrong. The interview is not supposed to be an aggressive situation towards the candidate. So keep your practice up and don't worry to much about this!īain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger |Former Head Recruiter | Market Sizing Not every good consultant needs to worry about being thrown off course intentionally.įinally, there's no such thing as “the end for you." The interview is long and sophisticated enough that even if you do poorly in one small part, you can sometimes compensate in another part. This challenge is about dealing with new information, making strong arguments, and demonstrating conviction, something that every good consultant should be able to do. For example, if the candidate says that an investment makes sense, I could say, “Let's say the client doesn't want to invest under any circumstances. Rather, I would challenge someone to consider new information or a different perspective. This does not simulate the real world very well, so would not make for a good interview question. I have never deliberately asked someone a question with the intention of throwing them off course. Ex-McK Experienced Hire and EM - I show you how to perform at your best ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |